Advertising Rules in Japan for Foreign Brands:
Misleading Claims, Stealth Marketing and TikTok/Meta Ad Review (2026)
Japan's advertising rules apply to any brand that advertises to consumers in Japan, wherever the company is based. The key law is the Premiums and Representations Act, which bans misleading claims about quality and price, regulates stealth marketing and can lead to published orders, surcharges and, since 2024, criminal fines. On top of the law, TikTok and Meta run their own ad review. This guide explains what foreign marketers need to know about No.1 claims, price comparisons, "limited time" offers, disclaimers and testimonials, the most common platform rejection reasons in Japan, and a practical checklist for Japanese video scripts. It is general information, not legal advice.
Key takeaways
- Japan's Premiums and Representations Act covers ads aimed at Japanese consumers regardless of where the advertiser is based; the 2024 amendment added cross-border enforcement tools
- No.1 claims need a fair survey of actual users against the main competitors, former prices generally need to have applied for more than half of the prior 8 weeks, and "limited time" offers must really end
- Penalties include published cease-and-desist orders, a 3% surcharge on sales (4.5% for repeat offenders) and, since October 2024, criminal fines of up to ¥1 million
- TikTok and Meta review is a separate gate: exaggerated claims, before-and-after footage, landing page mismatches and personal-attribute call-outs are frequent rejection reasons
- Health, cosmetics and finance need specialist legal review; the efficient place to manage all of this is the Japanese script, before shooting
Do Japan's advertising rules apply to foreign brands?
Yes. Japan's core advertising law, the Premiums and Representations Act (Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, often shortened to Keihin Hyoji Ho or Keihyoho), regulates representations made to consumers in Japan. What matters is who sees the ad and who sells the product, not where the advertiser is incorporated. If you run a TikTok or Meta campaign targeting Japan, sell through a Japanese app store listing or ship to Japanese customers, your ads, landing pages and social posts are in scope.
The 2023 amendment, in force since October 1, 2024, made this explicit for cross-border cases. It added rules for serving cease-and-desist orders abroad and a framework for the Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) to share information with foreign enforcement authorities, citing the need to address misleading representations by foreign businesses aimed at Japanese consumers.
Enforcement is active. In fiscal 2025 (April 2025 to March 2026) the CAA issued 13 cease-and-desist orders, approved 8 commitment plans, issued 10 surcharge payment orders totaling ¥339.4 million and handled 388 cases with administrative guidance. Many of these cases come down to wording: a claim, price or deadline shown in a misleading way.
Not legal advice. This article is general information based on official sources as of October 2026. Rules are interpreted case by case. For a specific product or claim, consult a qualified Japanese lawyer or the CAA's published guidelines.
The Premiums and Representations Act: three kinds of misleading representations
Article 5 of the Act prohibits three types of representation. "Representation" is broad: it covers video, narration, on-screen text (telop), captions, banners, landing pages, app store copy and social posts.
| Type | What it means | Typical problem in a video ad |
|---|---|---|
| Misleading quality (yuryo gonin, Art. 5(1)) | Shows quality, standards or content as significantly better than reality or than competitors | Performance claims with no data; "No.1" or "most popular" without a sound survey; exaggerated demo footage |
| Misleading terms (yuri gonin, Art. 5(2)) | Shows price or other trading terms as significantly more favorable than reality or than competitors | Inflated "regular price" comparisons; "limited time" offers that never end; hidden conditions on "free" |
| Designated representations (Art. 5(3)) | Specific categories the Prime Minister has designated, such as country of origin and stealth marketing | Influencer or UGC content that hides the fact that it is an ad |
You must be able to prove performance claims, fast
Under the substantiation rule (Article 7(2)), when the CAA suspects a quality or performance claim is misleading, it can ask the advertiser to submit materials showing a reasonable basis. The deadline is, in principle, 15 days from the written request, and the need to run a new test is not accepted as a reason for extension. If you cannot submit adequate evidence in time, the claim is deemed misleading for the purpose of a cease-and-desist order.
The lesson: keep evidence for every claim on file before launch, and check that it supports the claim as a Japanese viewer reads it.
No.1 claims, price comparisons and "limited time" offers
"No.1" and "satisfaction" claims need a fair survey
"Customer satisfaction No.1" style claims are common in Japanese advertising, and they are a recurring enforcement target. The CAA notes that in fiscal 2023, 13 of the 44 businesses that received cease-and-desist orders were involved in No.1-related representations, typically based on "image surveys" where respondents simply looked at websites and picked an impression. In its September 2024 report, the CAA set out four conditions a No.1 claim needs to be backed by a reasonable basis:
- Fair comparison set: the main competing products or services in the category are included.
- Right respondents: if the claim implies actual users (for example "customer satisfaction"), the respondents must be actual users. A footnote saying it was an image survey does not fix the mismatch.
- Fair method: no steering, such as fixing your product at the top of the list or stopping the survey when you reach first place.
- Claim matches the result: the wording on screen corresponds to what the survey actually measured.
The same thinking applies to "X% of experts recommend" claims. If you cannot meet these conditions, drop the ranking and use a concrete, verifiable fact instead.
Price comparisons: the "8-week" rule of thumb
Showing a struck-through former price next to a sale price is a "double price" representation. The CAA's pricing guideline treats a former price as safe to compare against if it was the price "for a reasonable recent period." As a general benchmark, that means the item sold at that price for more than half of the 8 weeks before the sale started (or of the selling period, if shorter). It does not qualify if the total period at that price was under 2 weeks, or if 2 weeks or more have passed since the item was last sold at that price.
Comparisons with a future price ("¥X after launch") are risky unless you will certainly sell at that price, and "market price" comparisons need a verifiable basis.
"Limited time" and countdown offers must really end
A deadline is a trading term. If the same or better deal remains available after the stated end date, the deadline misleads. In June 2026, for example, the CAA issued a cease-and-desist order over social media posts announcing a buyback campaign "until" a given date; the campaign was rolled over period after period, and customers could get the same or better rate after each deadline. For performance ads that refresh every few weeks, plan offers and creatives together so the telop never promises an ending that does not happen.
Penalties: cease-and-desist orders, surcharges and criminal fines
The consequences go beyond a rejected ad:
- Cease-and-desist order (sochi meirei): the business must stop the representation, publicly notify consumers that it was misleading and put prevention measures in place. Orders are published on the CAA website with the company name.
- Surcharge: for misleading quality or terms, the surcharge is 3% of sales of the product or service during the relevant period, capped at the most recent 3 years. Since October 2024 the rate rises to 4.5% for businesses that received a surcharge order within the previous 10 years. No surcharge is imposed if the calculated amount is under ¥1.5 million.
- Criminal penalty: since the 2024 amendment, intentionally making a misleading quality or terms representation can be punished with a fine of up to ¥1 million, with penalties also applicable to the company.
- Commitment procedure: also new since October 2024, a business suspected of a violation can propose a corrective plan. If the CAA approves it, no order or surcharge is issued, but the approval and an outline of the case are published.
For a brand entering Japan, the reputational cost of a published order often outweighs the money.
ZVA production services
Vertical video for Japan, with a global team
We handle everything in-house, from planning and Japanese scripts to Japanese talent, shooting and telop editing, and we can run the ads too. We work in Japanese, English, Korean and Chinese. From ¥50,000 per video (overseas projects are quoted individually), with delivery in as few as 5 business days.
Get a free quote →Stealth marketing: the short version
Since October 1, 2023, advertising that hides its commercial nature has been a designated misleading representation under the same Act. Key points:
- The advertiser is regulated, not the influencer or creator who posts.
- It covers posts the advertiser effectively controls, even without written instructions, and can cover employee posts.
- Disclosure must be clear: "advertisement," "PR" or "sponsored," shown where and when viewers will notice it. Burying "#PR" in a block of hashtags or flashing it at the end of a long video is not enough.
Paid ads carrying the platform's "Sponsored" label are clearly ads; the risk sits in organic creator posts, gifted campaigns and testimonials on your own site. For the full rules, platform disclosure settings and a pre-engagement checklist, see our guide to UGC and influencer ads in Japan.
Platform ad review in Japan: TikTok and Meta
Legal compliance and platform approval are two separate gates. An ad can be lawful and still be rejected, and an approved ad can still breach Japanese law. TikTok, for example, states that advertisers are responsible for their ads and must comply with local laws in the regions they target.
How review works
- TikTok: most ads are reviewed within 24 hours, though some take longer. Review covers the video, ad text and landing page. Editing and saving the creative triggers a new review, and you can open an Advertiser Support ticket if you believe a rejection was a mistake.
- Meta (Facebook, Instagram): ads are typically reviewed within 24 hours. Review covers images, video, text, targeting and the landing page. An edited ad is reviewed again as a new ad, and you can request another review through Account Quality. Violations can also lead to restrictions on the ad account or Business assets.
In ZVA's experience running campaigns in Japan, ads in regulated categories such as finance, beauty or supplements can take 2 to 3 business days, and first submissions from new accounts may trigger additional business verification. We recommend finishing submission at least 3 business days before a fixed launch date.
Common rejection reasons we see in Japan
| Reason | Platform policy basis | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Exaggerated or absolute claims ("guaranteed," "100%," "No.1" without a source) | TikTok prohibits promising or exaggerating results and absolute terms about a product in relation to time, region or brand; Meta prohibits deceptive or misleading claims | Use specific, sourced facts; show the source and survey date on screen |
| Before-and-after comparisons | TikTok lists product-effect comparisons such as before-and-after results as misleading | Show the product in use, the process or the routine instead of a result comparison |
| Ad and landing page do not match | TikTok rejects ad content inconsistent with the website, such as a different discount; Meta reviews the destination | Same price, offer, conditions and product on both; check the page loads on mobile |
| Calling out personal attributes ("Are you in debt?", "Struggling with acne?") | Meta's personal attributes policy prohibits asserting or implying them; in ZVA's experience TikTok review flags them too | Address a situation or interest ("Reviewing your household budget?") rather than the viewer's condition |
| Unlicensed music, logos or footage | Intellectual property policies on both platforms | Use licensed tracks (for TikTok, the Commercial Music Library) and your own footage |
| Undisclosed AI-generated content | TikTok rejects or restricts ads with AI-generated content it identifies as undisclosed | Label AI-generated or significantly AI-edited content |
Repeated rejections delay learning, and both platforms can restrict accounts that keep violating policy. Fixing the script before shooting is far cheaper than re-editing.
Health, cosmetics and finance: specialist review required
Some categories sit under additional, stricter laws on top of the Premiums and Representations Act:
- Cosmetics, quasi-drugs, supplements, medical devices and health-related products: the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Act (PMD Act) and related rules restrict what can be said about effects. Platforms also apply their own healthcare policies.
- Consumer lending, investment, FX, crypto-assets and insurance: the Money Lending Business Act, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, the Insurance Business Act and industry self-regulation set mandatory disclosures and prohibited expressions. Platforms often require licenses or pre-approval for financial advertisers.
This article does not give claim-level guidance for these categories. Any copy about effects, results or returns should be reviewed by a qualified Japanese specialist before production, and a good production partner builds that step into the schedule.
Practical checklist for Japanese video creatives
Most problems are visible in the script. Use this list when you review a Japanese script or edit.
- Back every number and ranking with a source, and show the source name and date in the telop
- Put a disclaimer on the same screen as the claim it qualifies, large enough and long enough to read on a phone
- Say important conditions in narration as well as text when the main claim is spoken
- Use offer deadlines and former prices that are real and documented
- Show the product being used, the steps or the app's real screens
- Match price, offer and conditions between the ad and the landing page
- Label ads clearly when content is posted from a creator's account
- "Guaranteed," "100%," "anyone can" and similar absolute wording
- "No.1" based on an image survey or an incomplete comparison set
- Before-and-after footage or close-ups designed to provoke insecurity
- A claim on one screen and its condition on the next, or a 1-second disclaimer
- Testimonials that imply most people get a result when that is not the case
- Relying on "individual results vary" to rescue an overstated message
- Gameplay or app footage that does not match the real product
Telop and disclaimers
The CAA's guidance on qualifying statements (uchikeshi hyoji) says a video disclaimer is judged by its size, its contrast with the background, how long the screen stays up relative to the amount of text, whether it appears on the same screen as the claim, and whether it is voiced when the claim is voiced. The headline must reflect reality; a disclaimer that contradicts it does not fix it.
Testimonials and UGC-style ads
The same CAA guidance notes that viewers who see a user testimonial tend to assume most people get similar results, and that "this is an individual's opinion" rarely changes that impression. If results depend on conditions, the conditions must be clear. For UGC-style ads with Japanese talent, write testimonials around experience and usability, keep them consistent with what the product reliably delivers, and never present scripted talent as independent customers. Our localization guide covers how to write Japanese hooks and telop that feel native without overstating.
Why foreign brands hand Japanese scripts to a local team
Translation tools cannot tell you that a phrase harmless in English reads as an absolute claim in Japanese, that a telop needs another second on screen, or that a "regular price" fails the 8-week benchmark. Those are line-by-line judgment calls, made in Japanese, before the shoot.
ZVA is a Fukuoka-based team specialized in vertical video ads. We plan, script, cast Japanese talent, shoot in our own studio and edit, and we also run TikTok, Meta and Google campaigns. For regulated products, our workflow looks like this:
Two honest caveats, which also appear on our pricing page: passing platform review is not guaranteed, and final decisions on ad expressions rest with the advertiser. What we can do is make rejections and legal risk much less likely by catching problems at the script stage. Production starts from ¥50,000 per video (overseas projects quoted individually), with delivery in as few as 5 business days, and we work in Japanese, English, Korean and Chinese. Performance-based ad operation plans are available.
Summary
- The Premiums and Representations Act applies to foreign brands advertising to Japanese consumers, with stronger penalties since 2024.
- The riskiest elements are No.1 claims, former-price comparisons, deadlines that never end, before-and-after footage, testimonials and fleeting disclaimers.
- TikTok and Meta review is a separate gate; health, cosmetics and finance need specialist legal review on top.
The most efficient place to manage all of this is the Japanese script. If you want vertical video ads for Japan written with these rules in mind, produced with Japanese talent and taken through platform review, ask ZVA for a quote. Tell us your product, target platforms and any claims you want to make, and we will tell you what we can say, how we would say it and what it will cost.
References and sources
- Consumer Affairs Agency: Regulation of misleading representations (Japanese)
- Consumer Affairs Agency: Overview of the amended Premiums and Representations Act, effective October 1, 2024 (Japanese)
- Consumer Affairs Agency: Approach to Article 8 (surcharge payment orders), revised April 18, 2024 (Japanese)
- Consumer Affairs Agency: Enforcement of the Premiums and Representations Act in FY2025 (May 28, 2026) (Japanese)
- Consumer Affairs Agency: Q&A on representations, including the substantiation deadline (Japanese)
- Consumer Affairs Agency: Fact-finding survey on No.1 representations, summary (September 26, 2024) (Japanese)
- Consumer Affairs Agency: Approach to unjustifiable price representations (pricing guideline) (Japanese)
- Consumer Affairs Agency: Double price representations (Japanese)
- Consumer Affairs Agency: Cease-and-desist order on a time-limited buyback campaign (June 11, 2026) (Japanese)
- Consumer Affairs Agency: Points to note on qualifying statements (disclaimers) and testimonials (Japanese)
- Consumer Affairs Agency: Stealth marketing regulation (Japanese)
- TikTok Business Help Center: Misleading and false content (ad policy)
- TikTok Business Help Center: Ad review FAQ
- TikTok Business Help Center: Market-specific requirements for ad approval
- Meta Transparency Center: Advertising Standards
Figures and rules are as of each source's publication date (checked October 2026); review times and rejection patterns marked as ZVA's experience are based on ZVA's own campaigns. Statements about laws and platform policies are general information, not legal advice.